How would one know that a rogue chemist didn’t come up with an elaborate plan to tamper with the samples? Is there any evidence that they didn’t do that? Trust them because they’re highly reputable? Because they charge a high fee for their services? Because they’re highly trained? Because they have high moral fibre? Utter madness….
If a world class athlete fails a drug test I tend to believe the results because every single world class athlete is clearly using drugs.
You’re point of view is highly disputable. That’s the issue I have with the whole situation. It’s pretty much he said she said, career’s dead. It seems crazy to me.
Clutching at straws here. I dont believe the boar meat or mexican beef bs either. I think its more likely that 95% or more are roided.
2 or 3 seperate testing bodies need to take samples and if their results don't match or correlate with one another then we have both a reliability AND validity problem. If they're going to test then do it properly under a scientific testing procedure whereby the results can be replicated and extrapolated.
Are you taking the ****? It's the equivalent of trusting the US Government on the magic bullet theory. What's the difference?
The state of this. So if you believe in the test results so much, where are the other positive results for the other thousands of athletes we’ve yet to hear of?
Matchroom have VADA testing for all their events. Even McCaskill vs Ryan, Opetaia vs Thompson and Hitchins vs Zepeda had VADA testing. Is it time for other promoters to follow their example to make the sport cleaner and safer? This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
So who'd you rather believe, a testing agency that may or may not be employing rogue chemists spiking samples for the hell of it, or Mr "My Boar's Meat got tampered with nandrolone when I tried to inject it in me bum 'ole"?
